RHINEBECK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

77

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

100

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

52

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

68

37%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

48

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

178
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

85

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

20

50%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

107

31%

LEVEL 4

98

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

15

42%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

25

54%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

203
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

77

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

210
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

123

32%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

100

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

66

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

90

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

26

28%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.