RED HOOK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

76

15%

LEVEL 2

163

31%

LEVEL 3

164

32%

LEVEL 4

116

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

112

20%

LEVEL 2

178

31%

LEVEL 3

166

29%

LEVEL 4

112

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

244
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

135

31%

LEVEL 3

146

33%

LEVEL 4

98

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

240
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

77

16%

LEVEL 2

159

33%

LEVEL 3

141

30%

LEVEL 4

99

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

22

42%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

143

32%

LEVEL 3

157

35%

LEVEL 4

115

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

70

14%

LEVEL 2

143

29%

LEVEL 3

160

33%

LEVEL 4

112

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

38

58%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

42

51%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

272
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

70

14%

LEVEL 2

159

32%

LEVEL 3

159

32%

LEVEL 4

113

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

277
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

101

18%

LEVEL 2

174

32%

LEVEL 3

165

30%

LEVEL 4

112

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

92

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

93

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

57

38%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.