G W KRIEGER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

132

46%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

162

55%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

68

47%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

76

53%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

64

45%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

86

56%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

63

50%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

70

60%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

48

44%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

70

56%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

84

36%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

120

48%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

48

92%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

42

93%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

69
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

103

43%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

124

52%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

38

67%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

17

37%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

40

47%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

115

48%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

122

58%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

120

44%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

149

53%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

13

81%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.