SIDNEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

127

31%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

164

36%

LEVEL 2

123

27%

LEVEL 3

116

25%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

69

32%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

69

32%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

95

39%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

103

28%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

142

36%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

17

53%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

124

30%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

114

28%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

38

75%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

40

82%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

125

30%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

128

31%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

78

39%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

88

41%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

108

45%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

163
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

126

31%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

169
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

160

36%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

113

25%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.