MARATHON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

115

38%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

111

37%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

52

34%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

63

42%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

59

41%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

109

38%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

105

36%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

64

27%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

95

39%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

51

80%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

46

78%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

86
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

109

37%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

91

47%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

85

46%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

108

36%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.