Skip to Content
Main content

MONTGOMERY C SMITH ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

153

46%

LEVEL 2

76

23%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

172

46%

LEVEL 2

94

25%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

69

43%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

79

41%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

84

49%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

93

51%

LEVEL 2

40

22%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

29

51%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

63

43%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

42

71%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

43

65%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

42

58%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

108

39%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

134

42%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

45

80%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

38

72%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

125

45%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

141

43%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

28

54%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

31

72%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

28

34%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

27

33%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

125

50%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

147

52%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

102
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

136

44%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

103
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

157

45%

LEVEL 2

89

26%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.