PERU CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

132

26%

LEVEL 2

167

33%

LEVEL 3

113

22%

LEVEL 4

92

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

180

30%

LEVEL 2

181

30%

LEVEL 3

149

25%

LEVEL 4

95

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

98

32%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

120

26%

LEVEL 2

153

33%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

84

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

227
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

162

29%

LEVEL 2

174

31%

LEVEL 3

141

25%

LEVEL 4

86

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

71

17%

LEVEL 2

142

34%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

91

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

157

32%

LEVEL 3

145

30%

LEVEL 4

93

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

61

70%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

87

74%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

95

41%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

131

44%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

205
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

127

26%

LEVEL 2

165

33%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

92

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

244
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

176

29%

LEVEL 2

179

30%

LEVEL 3

149

25%

LEVEL 4

95

16%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

204
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

131

26%

LEVEL 2

164

33%

LEVEL 3

112

22%

LEVEL 4

92

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

244
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

177

30%

LEVEL 2

179

30%

LEVEL 3

149

25%

LEVEL 4

95

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.