Skip to Content
Main content

BEEKMANTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

217

36%

LEVEL 2

186

31%

LEVEL 3

151

25%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

258

41%

LEVEL 2

184

29%

LEVEL 3

138

22%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

94

33%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

116

39%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

142

42%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

203

35%

LEVEL 2

179

31%

LEVEL 3

149

26%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

236

39%

LEVEL 2

178

30%

LEVEL 3

134

22%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

146

28%

LEVEL 2

174

33%

LEVEL 3

150

29%

LEVEL 4

52

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

166

31%

LEVEL 2

174

33%

LEVEL 3

136

26%

LEVEL 4

55

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

71

85%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

92

88%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

145

49%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

176

54%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

201
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

210

35%

LEVEL 2

185

31%

LEVEL 3

149

25%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

189
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

243

40%

LEVEL 2

180

29%

LEVEL 3

134

22%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.