AUSABLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

117

25%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

146

31%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

35

27%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

33

28%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

53

24%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

67

27%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

201
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

114

25%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

138

30%

LEVEL 4

63

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

130

33%

LEVEL 3

143

36%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

32

82%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

55

70%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

34

31%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

48

34%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

209
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

115

24%

LEVEL 2

148

31%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

67

27%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

209
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

114

24%

LEVEL 2

146

31%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.