Skip to Content
Main content

ELMIRA HEIGHTS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

143

34%

LEVEL 2

103

24%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

68

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

131

30%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

69

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

56

26%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

40

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

76

36%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

75

34%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

15

42%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

128

34%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

112

29%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

80

23%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

73

20%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

103

28%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

63

85%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

58

78%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

54

28%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

89

39%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

89

36%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

129

30%

LEVEL 2

126

29%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

68

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.