HENDY AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

223

48%

LEVEL 2

97

21%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

206

48%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

67

16%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

98

47%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

105

50%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

125

49%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

101

47%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

39

58%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

30

46%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

64

20%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

121

45%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

32

55%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

42

60%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

167

42%

LEVEL 2

90

23%

LEVEL 3

82

21%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

155

42%

LEVEL 2

100

27%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

56

81%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

51

86%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

48

35%

LEVEL 4

31

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

30

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

188

58%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

37

11%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

178

62%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

219

48%

LEVEL 2

97

21%

LEVEL 3

84

18%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.