Skip to Content
Main content

PARLEY COBURN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

253

53%

LEVEL 2

102

21%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

201

44%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

128

54%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

98

45%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

125

52%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

103

44%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

46

58%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

28

40%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

174

53%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

138

43%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

27

50%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

27

53%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

191

47%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

145

37%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

62

85%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

56

81%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

37

38%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

45

37%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

216

57%

LEVEL 2

75

20%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

156

47%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

246

53%

LEVEL 2

101

22%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.