FREDONIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

95

24%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

114

29%

LEVEL 4

71

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

92

23%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

85

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

40

22%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

52

26%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

57

28%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

78

24%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

76

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

40

60%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

110

32%

LEVEL 4

71

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

85

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

35

78%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

46

84%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

185
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

89

23%

LEVEL 2

108

28%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

203
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

99

25%

LEVEL 2

90

23%

LEVEL 3

119

30%

LEVEL 4

84

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

65

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

93

38%

LEVEL 4

70

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

62

40%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

78

48%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.