AUBURN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

419
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,207

LEVEL 1

422

35%

LEVEL 2

366

30%

LEVEL 3

260

22%

LEVEL 4

159

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

505
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,336

LEVEL 1

497

37%

LEVEL 2

334

25%

LEVEL 3

342

26%

LEVEL 4

163

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

206
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

194

34%

LEVEL 2

171

30%

LEVEL 3

127

22%

LEVEL 4

79

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

222

36%

LEVEL 2

172

28%

LEVEL 3

153

25%

LEVEL 4

69

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

213
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

228

36%

LEVEL 2

195

31%

LEVEL 3

133

21%

LEVEL 4

80

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

283
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

275

38%

LEVEL 2

162

23%

LEVEL 3

189

26%

LEVEL 4

94

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

54

43%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

66

45%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

351
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 920

LEVEL 1

291

32%

LEVEL 2

278

30%

LEVEL 3

215

23%

LEVEL 4

136

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

410
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,022

LEVEL 1

363

36%

LEVEL 2

249

24%

LEVEL 3

277

27%

LEVEL 4

133

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

48

62%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

34

47%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

29

41%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

34

43%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

411
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,039

LEVEL 1

291

28%

LEVEL 2

337

32%

LEVEL 3

254

24%

LEVEL 4

157

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

485
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,143

LEVEL 1

353

31%

LEVEL 2

305

27%

LEVEL 3

326

29%

LEVEL 4

159

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

131

78%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

144

75%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

240
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

102

21%

LEVEL 2

143

29%

LEVEL 3

135

28%

LEVEL 4

105

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

272
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

102

20%

LEVEL 2

129

26%

LEVEL 3

169

34%

LEVEL 4

103

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

320

44%

LEVEL 2

223

31%

LEVEL 3

125

17%

LEVEL 4

54

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 833

LEVEL 1

395

47%

LEVEL 2

205

25%

LEVEL 3

173

21%

LEVEL 4

60

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

411
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,164

LEVEL 1

400

34%

LEVEL 2

353

30%

LEVEL 3

255

22%

LEVEL 4

156

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

493
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,299

LEVEL 1

480

37%

LEVEL 2

326

25%

LEVEL 3

332

26%

LEVEL 4

161

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

22

51%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

17

46%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.