Skip to Content
Main content

PIONEER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

65

13%

LEVEL 2

148

30%

LEVEL 3

179

36%

LEVEL 4

100

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

76

15%

LEVEL 2

130

26%

LEVEL 3

177

36%

LEVEL 4

115

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

88

36%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

62

13%

LEVEL 2

143

30%

LEVEL 3

174

37%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

286
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

73

15%

LEVEL 2

122

25%

LEVEL 3

171

36%

LEVEL 4

115

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

158

40%

LEVEL 4

97

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

160

41%

LEVEL 4

111

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

44

44%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

55

52%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

94

41%

LEVEL 4

58

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

68

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

279
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

63

13%

LEVEL 2

145

30%

LEVEL 3

179

37%

LEVEL 4

100

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.