YORKSHIRE-PIONEER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

494
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 835

LEVEL 1

115

14%

LEVEL 2

226

27%

LEVEL 3

300

36%

LEVEL 4

194

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

480
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 821

LEVEL 1

134

16%

LEVEL 2

207

25%

LEVEL 3

292

36%

LEVEL 4

188

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

272
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

51

12%

LEVEL 2

107

25%

LEVEL 3

161

37%

LEVEL 4

111

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

253
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

144

34%

LEVEL 4

109

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

222
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

139

34%

LEVEL 4

83

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

227
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

74

19%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

148

38%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

480
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 804

LEVEL 1

108

13%

LEVEL 2

216

27%

LEVEL 3

292

36%

LEVEL 4

188

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

464
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 788

LEVEL 1

125

16%

LEVEL 2

199

25%

LEVEL 3

279

35%

LEVEL 4

185

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

458
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

32

5%

LEVEL 2

168

26%

LEVEL 3

269

41%

LEVEL 4

189

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

440
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

160

25%

LEVEL 3

260

41%

LEVEL 4

180

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

83

47%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

99

53%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

256
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

94

25%

LEVEL 3

151

40%

LEVEL 4

105

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

149

39%

LEVEL 4

108

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

132

29%

LEVEL 3

149

33%

LEVEL 4

89

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

93

21%

LEVEL 2

124

28%

LEVEL 3

143

33%

LEVEL 4

80

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

490
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 824

LEVEL 1

112

14%

LEVEL 2

222

27%

LEVEL 3

296

36%

LEVEL 4

194

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

477
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 815

LEVEL 1

134

16%

LEVEL 2

204

25%

LEVEL 3

290

36%

LEVEL 4

187

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.