SALAMANCA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

234

41%

LEVEL 2

155

27%

LEVEL 3

123

21%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

218

37%

LEVEL 2

160

27%

LEVEL 3

122

21%

LEVEL 4

86

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

95

35%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

119

40%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

123

40%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

102

47%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

93

44%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

101

35%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

97

33%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

174

35%

LEVEL 2

142

29%

LEVEL 3

122

25%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

158

31%

LEVEL 2

147

29%

LEVEL 3

120

24%

LEVEL 4

83

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

60

78%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

60

77%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

44

26%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

190

47%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

180

45%

LEVEL 2

114

28%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

182
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

229

40%

LEVEL 2

155

27%

LEVEL 3

121

21%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.