GOWANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

134

31%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

113

28%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

84

43%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

16

44%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

47

46%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

39

40%

LEVEL 2

40

41%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

66

24%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

55

22%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

81

22%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

101

30%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

53

69%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

52

72%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

32

24%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

102

33%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

162
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

132

30%

LEVEL 2

139

32%

LEVEL 3

100

23%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.