OLEAN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 717

LEVEL 1

257

36%

LEVEL 2

216

30%

LEVEL 3

147

21%

LEVEL 4

97

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

198

29%

LEVEL 2

206

31%

LEVEL 3

150

22%

LEVEL 4

118

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

111

35%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

84

27%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

146

37%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

34

57%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

8

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

187

33%

LEVEL 2

180

31%

LEVEL 3

128

22%

LEVEL 4

79

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

225
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

153

28%

LEVEL 2

172

31%

LEVEL 3

125

23%

LEVEL 4

100

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

157

26%

LEVEL 2

201

34%

LEVEL 3

140

24%

LEVEL 4

96

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

119

21%

LEVEL 2

184

33%

LEVEL 3

145

26%

LEVEL 4

117

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

100

81%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

79

74%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

198

45%

LEVEL 2

125

28%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

146

38%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

243
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 712

LEVEL 1

255

36%

LEVEL 2

214

30%

LEVEL 3

146

21%

LEVEL 4

97

14%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

241
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

249

36%

LEVEL 2

211

30%

LEVEL 3

144

21%

LEVEL 4

97

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.