JOHNSON CITY ELEM/INTRMED SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

199

38%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

124

24%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

171

35%

LEVEL 2

141

29%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

68

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

101

37%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

86

36%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

98

40%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

20

37%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

88

31%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

45

65%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

28

44%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

32

51%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

35

48%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

157

34%

LEVEL 2

128

28%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

126

29%

LEVEL 2

133

31%

LEVEL 3

108

25%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

42

72%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

45

78%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

176
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

181

37%

LEVEL 2

127

26%

LEVEL 3

120

25%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

171
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

151

34%

LEVEL 2

128

28%

LEVEL 3

104

23%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

18

53%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

45

35%

LEVEL 4

31

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

172

44%

LEVEL 2

115

29%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

135

42%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

179
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

191

38%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

123

24%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.