AFRICAN ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

59

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

55

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

21

35%

LEVEL 4

30

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

29

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

29

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

26

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

26

74%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

24

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

31

40%

LEVEL 4

29

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

27

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

59

51%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

55

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

102
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

44

36%

LEVEL 4

58

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

91
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

55

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

49

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

42

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

13

38%

LEVEL 4

10

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.