TIOUGHNIOGA RIVERSIDE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

116

27%

LEVEL 2

125

29%

LEVEL 3

112

26%

LEVEL 4

73

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

122

26%

LEVEL 2

133

29%

LEVEL 3

134

29%

LEVEL 4

77

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

60

26%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

112

27%

LEVEL 2

117

28%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

71

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

117

26%

LEVEL 2

125

28%

LEVEL 3

132

29%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

72

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

115

30%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

53

73%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

60

71%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

47

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

59

33%

LEVEL 4

46

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

90

33%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

182
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

111

27%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

109

26%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

206
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

114

25%

LEVEL 2

128

29%

LEVEL 3

131

29%

LEVEL 4

75

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.