JENNIE F SNAPP MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

207

34%

LEVEL 2

168

28%

LEVEL 3

129

21%

LEVEL 4

100

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

183

30%

LEVEL 2

176

29%

LEVEL 3

176

29%

LEVEL 4

81

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

112

37%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

101

33%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

20

33%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

129

30%

LEVEL 2

118

28%

LEVEL 3

99

23%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

201
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

105

25%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

136

32%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

31

60%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

33

60%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

25

48%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

22

39%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

139

27%

LEVEL 2

157

30%

LEVEL 3

128

24%

LEVEL 4

99

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

119

22%

LEVEL 2

164

31%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

79

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

68

84%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

64

78%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

228
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

201

34%

LEVEL 2

168

28%

LEVEL 3

129

22%

LEVEL 4

99

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

80

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

166

49%

LEVEL 2

93

28%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

148

40%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

227
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

200

34%

LEVEL 2

163

28%

LEVEL 3

127

22%

LEVEL 4

100

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.