Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

165

26%

LEVEL 2

179

28%

LEVEL 3

192

30%

LEVEL 4

109

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

144

22%

LEVEL 2

187

29%

LEVEL 3

205

31%

LEVEL 4

119

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

77

26%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

85

28%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

111

32%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

102

29%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

274
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

137

24%

LEVEL 2

165

29%

LEVEL 3

172

30%

LEVEL 4

102

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

294
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

119

21%

LEVEL 2

162

28%

LEVEL 3

188

33%

LEVEL 4

106

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

86

16%

LEVEL 2

157

30%

LEVEL 3

181

34%

LEVEL 4

107

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

78

14%

LEVEL 2

163

30%

LEVEL 3

196

36%

LEVEL 4

115

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

79

69%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

66

64%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

300
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

156

25%

LEVEL 2

179

28%

LEVEL 3

191

30%

LEVEL 4

109

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

323
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

138

21%

LEVEL 2

185

29%

LEVEL 3

204

32%

LEVEL 4

119

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

9

90%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

81

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

131

36%

LEVEL 4

85

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

118

39%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

92

32%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

74

25%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

300
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

163

26%

LEVEL 2

176

28%

LEVEL 3

191

30%

LEVEL 4

109

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.