Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO FORKS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

143

25%

LEVEL 2

169

30%

LEVEL 3

169

30%

LEVEL 4

91

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

128

23%

LEVEL 2

172

31%

LEVEL 3

167

30%

LEVEL 4

89

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

246
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

125

24%

LEVEL 2

155

29%

LEVEL 3

162

31%

LEVEL 4

84

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

116

23%

LEVEL 2

158

31%

LEVEL 3

159

31%

LEVEL 4

82

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

87

18%

LEVEL 2

154

31%

LEVEL 3

165

33%

LEVEL 4

90

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

69

14%

LEVEL 2

162

34%

LEVEL 3

162

34%

LEVEL 4

89

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

56

74%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

59

80%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

60

19%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

70

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

50

16%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

70

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

83

33%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

259
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

139

25%

LEVEL 2

169

30%

LEVEL 3

169

30%

LEVEL 4

90

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.