VOORHEESVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

116

33%

LEVEL 4

141

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

59

15%

LEVEL 3

130

34%

LEVEL 4

154

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

77

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

32

16%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

84

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

64

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

70

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

122

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

256
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

137

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

9

56%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

52

16%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

140

44%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

47

14%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

153

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

20

50%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

244
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

51

16%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

138

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

264
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

52

15%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

149

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.