Skip to Content
Main content

FARNSWORTH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

433
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 801

LEVEL 1

121

15%

LEVEL 2

247

31%

LEVEL 3

250

31%

LEVEL 4

183

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

447
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

135

17%

LEVEL 2

205

26%

LEVEL 3

240

30%

LEVEL 4

207

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

232
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

62

15%

LEVEL 2

116

28%

LEVEL 3

140

34%

LEVEL 4

92

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

230
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

105

26%

LEVEL 3

127

32%

LEVEL 4

103

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

201
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

91

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

217
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

104

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

79
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

49

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

30

31%

LEVEL 4

41

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

313
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

88

15%

LEVEL 2

186

32%

LEVEL 3

195

33%

LEVEL 4

118

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

338
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

86

15%

LEVEL 2

163

28%

LEVEL 3

183

31%

LEVEL 4

155

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

9

25%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

420
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 700

LEVEL 1

72

10%

LEVEL 2

208

30%

LEVEL 3

239

34%

LEVEL 4

181

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

437
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

77

11%

LEVEL 2

187

27%

LEVEL 3

232

33%

LEVEL 4

205

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

49

49%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

58

67%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

428
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

113

14%

LEVEL 2

241

31%

LEVEL 3

247

32%

LEVEL 4

181

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

442
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 764

LEVEL 1

121

16%

LEVEL 2

201

26%

LEVEL 3

238

31%

LEVEL 4

204

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

379
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

77

12%

LEVEL 2

196

30%

LEVEL 3

212

33%

LEVEL 4

167

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

384
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

68

11%

LEVEL 2

162

26%

LEVEL 3

199

32%

LEVEL 4

185

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.