GUILDERLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,046
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,756

LEVEL 1

238

14%

LEVEL 2

472

27%

LEVEL 3

579

33%

LEVEL 4

467

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,047
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,737

LEVEL 1

262

15%

LEVEL 2

428

25%

LEVEL 3

537

31%

LEVEL 4

510

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

522
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 874

LEVEL 1

124

14%

LEVEL 2

228

26%

LEVEL 3

292

33%

LEVEL 4

230

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

528
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 893

LEVEL 1

126

14%

LEVEL 2

239

27%

LEVEL 3

279

31%

LEVEL 4

249

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

524
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 882

LEVEL 1

114

13%

LEVEL 2

244

28%

LEVEL 3

287

33%

LEVEL 4

237

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

519
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 844

LEVEL 1

136

16%

LEVEL 2

189

22%

LEVEL 3

258

31%

LEVEL 4

261

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

45
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

20

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

202
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

59

21%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

121

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

203
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

117

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

744
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,264

LEVEL 1

173

14%

LEVEL 2

347

27%

LEVEL 3

434

34%

LEVEL 4

310

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

743
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,241

LEVEL 1

170

14%

LEVEL 2

328

26%

LEVEL 3

390

31%

LEVEL 4

353

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

28

38%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

18

24%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,012
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,563

LEVEL 1

150

10%

LEVEL 2

401

26%

LEVEL 3

550

35%

LEVEL 4

462

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,017
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,558

LEVEL 1

151

10%

LEVEL 2

390

25%

LEVEL 3

514

33%

LEVEL 4

503

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

88

46%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

111

62%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,013
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,677

LEVEL 1

217

13%

LEVEL 2

447

27%

LEVEL 3

557

33%

LEVEL 4

456

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,022
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,662

LEVEL 1

231

14%

LEVEL 2

409

25%

LEVEL 3

520

31%

LEVEL 4

502

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

33
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

21

27%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

25
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

918
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,429

LEVEL 1

145

10%

LEVEL 2

366

26%

LEVEL 3

493

34%

LEVEL 4

425

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

905
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,368

LEVEL 1

136

10%

LEVEL 2

327

24%

LEVEL 3

438

32%

LEVEL 4

467

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

93

28%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

126

34%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.