Skip to Content
Main content

SHAKER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

78

13%

LEVEL 2

160

27%

LEVEL 3

204

34%

LEVEL 4

153

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

339
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

72

14%

LEVEL 2

115

22%

LEVEL 3

183

35%

LEVEL 4

156

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

98

37%

LEVEL 4

68

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

76

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

191
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

85

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

100

35%

LEVEL 4

80

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

76
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

34

34%

LEVEL 4

42

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

78
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

48

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

234
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

142

36%

LEVEL 4

92

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

125

39%

LEVEL 4

91

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

191

38%

LEVEL 4

152

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

96

21%

LEVEL 3

168

38%

LEVEL 4

153

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

51

57%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

42

53%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

352
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

65

11%

LEVEL 2

160

28%

LEVEL 3

199

34%

LEVEL 4

153

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

333
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

57

11%

LEVEL 2

109

22%

LEVEL 3

181

36%

LEVEL 4

152

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

109

25%

LEVEL 3

164

37%

LEVEL 4

137

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

269
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

82

21%

LEVEL 3

141

37%

LEVEL 4

128

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

47

31%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

28

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

349
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

156

27%

LEVEL 3

198

34%

LEVEL 4

151

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.