LISHA KILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

82

17%

LEVEL 2

132

27%

LEVEL 3

161

33%

LEVEL 4

113

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

114

26%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

113

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

54

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

62

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

21

41%

LEVEL 4

21

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

25

47%

LEVEL 4

20

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

78

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

154

37%

LEVEL 4

110

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

98

25%

LEVEL 3

143

37%

LEVEL 4

110

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

50

70%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

36

61%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

91

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

93

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

272
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

79

16%

LEVEL 2

132

27%

LEVEL 3

159

33%

LEVEL 4

113

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

259
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

114

26%

LEVEL 3

146

33%

LEVEL 4

113

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.