ALBANY SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

123

49%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

129

52%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

65

47%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

57

49%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

58

50%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

72

56%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

79

63%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

76

61%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

25

48%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

24

49%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

100

47%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

29

94%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

107

46%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

120

51%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

16

76%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

34

39%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

96

61%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

95

60%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

118

48%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

119

51%

LEVEL 2

53

23%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.