Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM S HACKETT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

298

64%

LEVEL 2

95

20%

LEVEL 3

57

12%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

262

58%

LEVEL 2

108

24%

LEVEL 3

46

10%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

130

60%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

108

56%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

168

67%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

154

59%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

36

63%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

31

45%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

37

36%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

39

36%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

154

75%

LEVEL 2

38

19%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

104

68%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

56

68%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

72

77%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

231

58%

LEVEL 2

92

23%

LEVEL 3

56

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

192

51%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

67

93%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

70

92%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

232

59%

LEVEL 2

88

23%

LEVEL 3

51

13%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

198

53%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

66

84%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

64

79%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

248

76%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

215

70%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

286

63%

LEVEL 2

90

20%

LEVEL 3

57

13%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

84
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

252

57%

LEVEL 2

106

24%

LEVEL 3

46

10%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

12

71%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.