ARBOR HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

76

58%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

73

49%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

34

59%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

29

47%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

42

58%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

44

50%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

56

60%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

52

51%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

63

56%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

57

45%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

68

48%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

70

57%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

66

49%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

68

57%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

65

50%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.