ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

163

38%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

161

36%

LEVEL 2

132

29%

LEVEL 3

105

23%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

76

33%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

80

33%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

87

42%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

154

37%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

152

36%

LEVEL 2

126

30%

LEVEL 3

98

23%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

54

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

87

25%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

75

84%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

74

77%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

34

24%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

132

44%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

55

18%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

127

41%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

157
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

154

35%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

158

37%

LEVEL 2

122

29%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.