Skip to Content
Main content

HUTCHINSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

65

38%

LEVEL 4

46

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

47

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

36

43%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

35

42%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

29

34%

LEVEL 4

25

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

26

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

9

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

7

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

12

17%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

24

35%

LEVEL 4

19

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

26

39%

LEVEL 4

21

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

13

57%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

17

34%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

17

32%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

64

44%

LEVEL 4

46

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

27

17%

LEVEL 3

63

41%

LEVEL 4

47

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

13

81%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

111
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

65

40%

LEVEL 4

46

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

51

38%

LEVEL 4

42

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

50

40%

LEVEL 4

42

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

17

37%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.