Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX CHARTER SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

34

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

83

32%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

24

33%

LEVEL 4

18

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

16

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

45

37%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

36

35%

LEVEL 4

25

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

83
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

61

33%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

33

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

70

31%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

14

41%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

10

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

17

44%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

24

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.