Skip to Content
Main content

CLEVELAND HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

31

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

31

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

37

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

33

38%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

30

33%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

8

57%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

40

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

46

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

31

74%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

59

24%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

27

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

37

39%

LEVEL 4

25

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.