Skip to Content
Main content

LAKELAND-COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

384
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 717

LEVEL 1

127

18%

LEVEL 2

206

29%

LEVEL 3

226

32%

LEVEL 4

158

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

457
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

101

13%

LEVEL 2

215

28%

LEVEL 3

258

33%

LEVEL 4

199

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

76

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

238
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

137

37%

LEVEL 4

101

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

206
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

74

19%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

219
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

62

15%

LEVEL 2

124

31%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

98

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

22

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

28

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

275
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

65

14%

LEVEL 2

134

28%

LEVEL 3

162

34%

LEVEL 4

113

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

305
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

117

25%

LEVEL 3

173

36%

LEVEL 4

132

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

62

10%

LEVEL 2

192

31%

LEVEL 3

217

35%

LEVEL 4

157

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

453
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

48

7%

LEVEL 2

190

27%

LEVEL 3

255

37%

LEVEL 4

198

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

65

73%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

53

65%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

384
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

123

17%

LEVEL 2

201

28%

LEVEL 3

226

32%

LEVEL 4

158

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

456
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 766

LEVEL 1

96

13%

LEVEL 2

214

28%

LEVEL 3

257

34%

LEVEL 4

199

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

332
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

79

14%

LEVEL 2

153

27%

LEVEL 3

189

34%

LEVEL 4

143

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

387
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

64

10%

LEVEL 2

160

26%

LEVEL 3

211

35%

LEVEL 4

176

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

48

31%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

37

23%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.