BRONX PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

92

30%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

39

26%

LEVEL 2

65

43%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

76

46%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

82
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

55

36%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

57

36%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

34

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

71

26%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

31

55%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

25

42%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

100
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

92

31%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

93

31%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.