Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

34

65%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

31

65%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.