Skip to Content
Main content

MS 301 PAUL L DUNBAR GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

152

63%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

149

65%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

59

58%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

71

65%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

93

67%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

78

64%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

63

66%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

89

65%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

80

63%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

113

59%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

115

60%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

39

78%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

34

89%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

107

61%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

100

60%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

45

69%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

49

75%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

146

63%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

141

65%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

125

63%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

118

63%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

27

63%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

31

72%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.