MS 302 LUISA DESSUS CRUZ GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

251

53%

LEVEL 2

120

25%

LEVEL 3

59

12%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

212

45%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

71

15%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

98

47%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

85

41%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

153

58%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

127

48%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

52

55%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

51

54%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

190

52%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

109
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

152

42%

LEVEL 2

99

28%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

151

44%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

128

37%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

100

77%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

84

67%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

92
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

165

47%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

120
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

141

39%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

86

70%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

71

67%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

237

53%

LEVEL 2

116

26%

LEVEL 3

56

12%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

207

45%

LEVEL 2

123

27%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

196

53%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

164

44%

LEVEL 2

96

26%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

55

55%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

48

51%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.