HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY WEST CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

73

19%

LEVEL 3

109

29%

LEVEL 4

143

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

147

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

78

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

32

17%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

76

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

38

19%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

65

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

71

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

197
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

62

21%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

113

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

206
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

44

16%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

116

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

24

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

25

39%

LEVEL 4

22

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

54

18%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

133

44%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

40

14%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

138

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

29

36%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

15

21%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

245
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

68

19%

LEVEL 3

103

29%

LEVEL 4

142

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

260
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

55

16%

LEVEL 3

114

33%

LEVEL 4

146

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

30

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

49

66%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

113

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

54

19%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

98

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

226
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

64

19%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

128

38%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

15

36%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.