HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY EAST CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

79

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

93

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

69

41%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

27

20%

LEVEL 3

53

39%

LEVEL 4

48

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

37

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

48

37%

LEVEL 4

45

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

111
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

42

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

113
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

52

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

46

38%

LEVEL 4

36

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

39

39%

LEVEL 4

39

39%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

101

42%

LEVEL 4

71

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

33

16%

LEVEL 3

88

42%

LEVEL 4

82

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

22

33%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

15

27%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

19

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

12

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

101

40%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

90

39%

LEVEL 4

81

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

176
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

74

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

15

43%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.