Skip to Content
Main content

BUFFALO UNITED CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

169

46%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

142

37%

LEVEL 2

138

36%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

93

47%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

78

39%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

76

44%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

161

46%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

129

40%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

132

42%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

121

36%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

37

70%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

139

37%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

165

47%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

131

38%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

99
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

141

38%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.