Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN EXCELSIOR CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

87

23%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

66

18%

LEVEL 2

106

28%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

39

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

158
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

74

23%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

159
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

22

33%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

19

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

74

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

72

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

28

41%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

192
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

100

27%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

195
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

64

18%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

77

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

9

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

17

45%

LEVEL 4

11

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

69

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

64

19%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

170
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

77

23%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

68

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.