BRONX CHARTER SCH BETTER LEARNING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

49

19%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

97

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

127

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

27

20%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

57

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

71

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

46

39%

LEVEL 4

40

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

56

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

151
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

77

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

180
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

39

16%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

106

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

13

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

91

39%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

120

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

179
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

96

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

209
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

44

16%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

126

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

20

36%

LEVEL 4

23

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

20

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

74

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

41

17%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

107

45%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

180
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

96

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.