KIPP STAR COLLEGE PREP CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

74

20%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

119

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

58

12%

LEVEL 2

93

20%

LEVEL 3

148

31%

LEVEL 4

174

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

54

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

87

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

65

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

87

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

116
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

63

35%

LEVEL 4

53

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

154
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

53

23%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

80

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

122
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

62

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

158
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

89

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

106

40%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

55

16%

LEVEL 3

113

33%

LEVEL 4

154

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

55
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

38

29%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

240
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

68

19%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

117

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

317
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

90

20%

LEVEL 3

146

32%

LEVEL 4

171

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

16

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

33

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

72

21%

LEVEL 3

116

34%

LEVEL 4

103

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

271
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

88

21%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

141

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

211
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

109

34%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

24

52%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.