Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX CS FOR EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

57

11%

LEVEL 2

122

23%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

184

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

370
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

48

9%

LEVEL 2

116

22%

LEVEL 3

133

25%

LEVEL 4

237

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

199
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

113

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

140

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

71

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

52

21%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

97

40%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

133
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

75

34%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

141
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

74

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

48

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

64

37%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

341
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

103

22%

LEVEL 3

163

34%

LEVEL 4

178

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

348
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

89

19%

LEVEL 3

124

27%

LEVEL 4

224

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

343
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

116

23%

LEVEL 3

162

32%

LEVEL 4

181

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

356
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

104

21%

LEVEL 3

125

25%

LEVEL 4

231

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

40

34%

LEVEL 4

43

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

49

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

273
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

95

23%

LEVEL 3

132

32%

LEVEL 4

141

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

295
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

92

22%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

188

44%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

349
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

55

11%

LEVEL 2

116

22%

LEVEL 3

169

33%

LEVEL 4

180

35%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.