NYC LAB MS-COLLABORATIVE STUDIES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

373
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

15

4%

LEVEL 3

41

10%

LEVEL 4

332

81%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

384
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

21

5%

LEVEL 3

34

8%

LEVEL 4

350

84%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

140

84%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

171

85%

MALE

PROFICIENT

217
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

192

79%

MALE

PROFICIENT

195
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

14

7%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

179

84%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

19

83%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

21

84%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

226
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

204

87%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

262
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

4

1%

LEVEL 3

12

4%

LEVEL 4

250

93%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

94

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

63

70%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

12

55%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

29

9%

LEVEL 4

309

91%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

349
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

1%

LEVEL 3

23

6%

LEVEL 4

326

92%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

23

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

24

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

370
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

15

4%

LEVEL 3

39

10%

LEVEL 4

331

82%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

380
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

20

5%

LEVEL 3

34

8%

LEVEL 4

346

85%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

8

3%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

201

83%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

253
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

14

5%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

228

84%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

131

78%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

122

84%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.